Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Drinking water service usage

Guinea-Bissau
24.0%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
25.5%
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
147th

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
0102030200020122024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 25.5% against 24.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.5%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 163 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 19.0% 29.4% 10.4% Zimbabwe
2010s 21.9% 27.4% 5.5% Zimbabwe
2020s 23.8% 25.8% 2.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 25.5% against 24.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
1.5%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 147th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.