Latvia vs New Caledonia: Drinking water service usage

Latvia
97.0%
in 2024
New Caledonia
96.9%
in 2024
Latvia rank
44th
New Caledonia rank
46th

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Latvia
  • New Caledonia
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 97.0% against 96.9% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 46th of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
2000s 92.8% 88.9% 3.8% Latvia
2010s 94.9% 94.9% 0.1% Latvia
2020s 96.8% 96.8% 0.0% New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Latvia or New Caledonia?
Latvia, at 97.0% against 96.9% in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Latvia and New Caledonia?
0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Caledonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Latvia and New Caledonia rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Latvia ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 46th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.