Lebanon vs Sri Lanka: Drinking water service usage

Lebanon
47.7%
in 2024
Sri Lanka
46.9%
in 2024
Lebanon rank
124th
Sri Lanka rank
126th

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Lebanon
  • Sri Lanka
01020304050200020122024

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 47.7% against 46.9% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.8%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Lebanon ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 163 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 44.5% 45.7% 1.2% Sri Lanka
2010s 46.8% 47.4% 0.6% Sri Lanka
2020s 47.7% 47.2% 0.5% Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Lebanon or Sri Lanka?
Lebanon, at 47.7% against 46.9% in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Lebanon and Sri Lanka?
0.8%, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sri Lanka?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Lebanon and Sri Lanka rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Lebanon ranks 124th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.