Monaco vs New Zealand: Drinking water service usage

Monaco
100.0%
in 2024
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2024
Monaco rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Monaco
  • New Zealand
020406080100200020122024

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Monaco ahead.

Monaco ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 163 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 85.4% 14.6% Monaco
2010s 100.0% 93.7% 6.3% Monaco
2020s 100.0% 99.8% 0.2% Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Monaco or New Zealand?
Monaco, at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Monaco and New Zealand?
0.0%, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Monaco and New Zealand rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Monaco ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.