Pakistan vs Sri Lanka: Drinking water service usage

Pakistan
45.0%
in 2024
Sri Lanka
46.9%
in 2024
Pakistan rank
129th
Sri Lanka rank
126th

Drinking water service usage over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sri Lanka
01020304050200020122024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 46.9% against 45.0% in Pakistan, a difference of 1.9%.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 129th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 163 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 43.1% 45.7% 2.6% Sri Lanka
2010s 44.2% 47.4% 3.2% Sri Lanka
2020s 44.9% 47.2% 2.3% Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher drinking water service usage, Pakistan or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 46.9% against 45.0% in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in drinking water service usage between Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
1.9%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sri Lanka?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Sri Lanka rank globally for drinking water service usage?
Pakistan ranks 129th and Sri Lanka ranks 126th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Drinking water service usage. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Drinking water service usage
Unit
%
Source
WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,991 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Proportion of people using an improved drinking water source that is located on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination.