How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural

Angola

8.4%

in 2023

Zimbabwe

7.5%

in 2023

Angola rank

147th

Zimbabwe rank

149th

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural over time

Angola
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Angola currently reports 8.4% against 7.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.9%.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 189 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	7.2%	4.7%	2.6%	Angola
2010s	7.6%	5.6%	2.0%	Angola
2020s	8.2%	7.2%	1.1%	Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural, Angola or Zimbabwe?: Angola, at 8.4% against 7.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural between Angola and Zimbabwe?: 0.9%, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural?: Angola ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Zimbabwe: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural. Statizoid, drawing on Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/angola/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/angola/zimbabwe/">Angola vs Zimbabwe: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population)
Unit: % of rural population
Source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 5,664 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural is the proportion of rural population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.