Kazakhstan vs Suriname: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural
Kazakhstan
90.9%
in 2023
Suriname
92.9%
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
81st
Suriname rank
79th
Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural over time
- Kazakhstan
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 92.9% against 90.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 79th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.6% | 64.7% | 10.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 86.8% | 83.2% | 3.5% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 90.2% | 91.8% | 1.6% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural, Kazakhstan or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 92.9% against 90.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural between Kazakhstan and Suriname?
- 2.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Suriname?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Suriname rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural?
- Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Suriname ranks 79th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural is the proportion of rural population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.