How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mongolia vs Namibia: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural

Mongolia

19.0%

in 2023

Namibia

13.5%

in 2023

Mongolia rank

136th

Namibia rank

139th

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural over time

Mongolia
Namibia

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 19.0% against 13.5% in Namibia, a difference of 5.5%.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 139th of 189 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mongolia	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3.9%	11.3%	7.4%	Namibia
2010s	10.7%	12.1%	1.4%	Namibia
2020s	17.4%	13.2%	4.1%	Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural, Mongolia or Namibia?: Mongolia, at 19.0% against 13.5% in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural between Mongolia and Namibia?: 5.5%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural?: Mongolia ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 139th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural. Statizoid, drawing on Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-rural-percent-of-rural-population/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population)
Unit: % of rural population
Source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 5,664 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural is the proportion of rural population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.