How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and China?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs China: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban

Cape Verde

95.1%

in 2023

China

95.2%

in 2023

Cape Verde rank

108th

China rank

105th

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban over time

Cape Verde
China

How they compare

China currently reports 95.2% against 95.1% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 108th and China ranks 105th of 189 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	China	Difference	Ahead
2000s	90.0%	73.7%	16.3%	Cape Verde
2010s	92.7%	86.9%	5.8%	Cape Verde
2020s	94.7%	94.3%	0.4%	Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban, Cape Verde or China?: China, at 95.2% against 95.1% in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban between Cape Verde and China?: 0.1%, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and China?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and China rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban?: Cape Verde ranks 108th and China ranks 105th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs China: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban. Statizoid, drawing on Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-urban-percent-of-urban-population/cabo-verde/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-urban-percent-of-urban-population/cabo-verde/china/">Cape Verde vs China: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population)
Unit: % of urban population
Source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 5,664 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban is the proportion of urban population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.