How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tonga?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Tonga: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban

China

95.2%

in 2023

Tonga

95.6%

in 2023

China rank

105th

Tonga rank

103rd

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban over time

China
Tonga

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 95.6% against 95.2% in China, a difference of 0.4%.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

China ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 103rd of 189 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Tonga	Difference	Ahead
2000s	73.7%	82.8%	9.1%	Tonga
2010s	86.9%	91.8%	4.8%	Tonga
2020s	94.3%	95.0%	0.7%	Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban, China or Tonga?: Tonga, at 95.6% against 95.2% in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban between China and Tonga?: 0.4%, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tonga?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do China and Tonga rank globally for access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban?: China ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 103rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO), published as Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Tonga: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban. Statizoid, drawing on Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-urban-percent-of-urban-population/china/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/access-to-clean-fuels-and-technologies-for-cooking-urban-percent-of-urban-population/china/tonga/">China vs Tonga: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population)
Unit: % of urban population
Source: Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report, International Energy Agency (IEA), note: License: Creative Commons Attribution—NonCommercial 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC 3.0 IGO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 236 places, 5,664 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban is the proportion of urban population primarily using clean cooking fuels and technologies for cooking. Under WHO guidelines, kerosene is excluded from clean cooking fuels.