Honduras vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Honduras
0.839 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
New Zealand
0.9704 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Honduras rank
50th
New Zealand rank
48th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Honduras
  • New Zealand
0.511.52200020102021

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.9704 Percentage of GDP against 0.839 Percentage of GDP in Honduras, a difference of 0.1314 Percentage of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 48th of 169 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 1.18 Percentage of GDP 0.6409 Percentage of GDP 0.5413 Percentage of GDP Honduras
2010s 1.51 Percentage of GDP 0.7075 Percentage of GDP 0.8059 Percentage of GDP Honduras
2020s 1.04 Percentage of GDP 0.9547 Percentage of GDP 0.0808 Percentage of GDP Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Honduras or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.9704 Percentage of GDP against 0.839 Percentage of GDP in Honduras as of 2021.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Honduras and New Zealand?
0.1314 Percentage of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and New Zealand?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Honduras and New Zealand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Honduras ranks 50th and New Zealand ranks 48th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Forest rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-forest-rents/honduras/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-forest-rents/honduras/new-zealand/">Honduras vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Forest rents
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,288 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.