New Zealand vs Tajikistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

New Zealand
0.9704 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
Tajikistan
1.01 Percentage of GDP
in 2021
New Zealand rank
48th
Tajikistan rank
47th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • New Zealand
  • Tajikistan
00.250.50.751200020102021

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 1.01 Percentage of GDP against 0.9704 Percentage of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0396 Percentage of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 48th and Tajikistan ranks 47th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6409 Percentage of GDP 0.0238 Percentage of GDP 0.617 Percentage of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0.7075 Percentage of GDP 0.5283 Percentage of GDP 0.1792 Percentage of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0.9547 Percentage of GDP 1 Percentage of GDP 0.0484 Percentage of GDP Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, New Zealand or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 1.01 Percentage of GDP against 0.9704 Percentage of GDP in New Zealand as of 2021.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between New Zealand and Tajikistan?
0.0396 Percentage of GDP, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tajikistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do New Zealand and Tajikistan rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
New Zealand ranks 48th and Tajikistan ranks 47th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Forest rents. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Tajikistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-forest-rents/new-zealand/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-forest-rents/new-zealand/tajikistan/">New Zealand vs Tajikistan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Forest rents
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,288 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.