Belgium vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development: Sectoral breakdown … agriculture

Belgium
0.7141 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
United Kingdom
0.8553 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Belgium rank
159th
United Kingdom rank
157th

Africa's Development: Sectoral breakdown … agriculture over time

  • Belgium
  • United Kingdom
00.511.5200020112022

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.8553 Percentage of GDP against 0.7141 Percentage of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0.1412 Percentage of GDP.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 159th and United Kingdom ranks 157th of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 1.05 Percentage of GDP 0.7856 Percentage of GDP 0.2625 Percentage of GDP Belgium
2010s 0.7574 Percentage of GDP 0.7005 Percentage of GDP 0.0569 Percentage of GDP Belgium
2020s 0.73 Percentage of GDP 0.793 Percentage of GDP 0.063 Percentage of GDP United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Belgium or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0.8553 Percentage of GDP against 0.7141 Percentage of GDP in Belgium as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Belgium and United Kingdom?
0.1412 Percentage of GDP, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and United Kingdom?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and United Kingdom rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Belgium ranks 159th and United Kingdom ranks 157th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added/belgium/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added/belgium/united-kingdom/">Belgium vs United Kingdom: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,604 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.