Liechtenstein vs Qatar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of

Liechtenstein
0.1787 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Qatar
0.245 Percentage of GDP
in 2022
Liechtenstein rank
167th
Qatar rank
166th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of over time

  • Liechtenstein
  • Qatar
0.10.20.30.4200020112022

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.245 Percentage of GDP against 0.1787 Percentage of GDP in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.0663 Percentage of GDP.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.4 times Liechtenstein's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Qatar ahead.

Liechtenstein ranks 167th and Qatar ranks 166th of 169 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liechtenstein Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 0.1546 Percentage of GDP 0.2029 Percentage of GDP 0.0484 Percentage of GDP Qatar
2010s 0.1272 Percentage of GDP 0.1511 Percentage of GDP 0.024 Percentage of GDP Qatar
2020s 0.1902 Percentage of GDP 0.2834 Percentage of GDP 0.0932 Percentage of GDP Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of, Liechtenstein or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.245 Percentage of GDP against 0.1787 Percentage of GDP in Liechtenstein as of 2022.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of between Liechtenstein and Qatar?
0.0663 Percentage of GDP, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Qatar?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Liechtenstein and Qatar rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 08 - sectoral breakdown of?
Liechtenstein ranks 167th and Qatar ranks 166th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liechtenstein vs Qatar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added/liechtenstein/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-08-sectoral-breakdown-of-the-economy-value-added/liechtenstein/qatar/">Liechtenstein vs Qatar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 08 - Sectoral breakdown of the economy — Value added in agriculture, hunting, forestry, fishing
Unit
Percentage of GDP
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,604 data points, 2000–2022
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 8 shows the breakdown of national economies by sectors of activity, looking at share of employment, contributions to GDP, along with the impact of natural resource extraction on the economy.