Africa, fragile states vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Africa, fragile states
589,940 Hectares
in 2020
Lesotho
2,600 Hectares
in 2020
Africa, fragile states rank
14th
Lesotho rank
20th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Africa, fragile states
  • Lesotho
0200.0k400.0k600.0k200020102020

How they compare

Africa, fragile states currently reports 589,940 Hectares against 2,600 Hectares in Lesotho, a difference of 587,340 Hectares.

That makes Africa, fragile states's figure about 226.9 times Lesotho's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Africa, fragile states has been ahead every year.

Africa, fragile states ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 20th of 47 regions.

Africa, fragile states has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, fragile states Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 551,788 Hectares 2,325 Hectares 549,463 Hectares Africa, fragile states
2010s 581,849 Hectares 2,302 Hectares 579,547 Hectares Africa, fragile states
2020s 589,940 Hectares 2,600 Hectares 587,340 Hectares Africa, fragile states

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, fragile states or Lesotho?
Africa, fragile states, at 589,940 Hectares against 2,600 Hectares in Lesotho as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, fragile states and Lesotho?
587,340 Hectares, with Africa, fragile states ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, fragile states and Lesotho?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, fragile states and Lesotho rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, fragile states ranks 14th and Lesotho ranks 20th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, fragile states vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/africa-fragile-states/lesotho-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/africa-fragile-states/lesotho-2/">Africa, fragile states vs Lesotho: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.