Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Australia
355,775 Hectares
in 2020
Least developed countries
784,808 Hectares
in 2020
Australia rank
4th
Least developed countries rank
5th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Australia
  • Least developed countries
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k200020102020

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 784,808 Hectares against 355,775 Hectares in Australia, a difference of 429,033 Hectares.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 2.2 times Australia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and Least developed countries ranks 5th of 169 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 418,401 Hectares 775,620 Hectares 357,220 Hectares Least developed countries
2010s 368,970 Hectares 782,072 Hectares 413,102 Hectares Least developed countries
2020s 355,775 Hectares 784,808 Hectares 429,033 Hectares Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Australia or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 784,808 Hectares against 355,775 Hectares in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Australia and Least developed countries?
429,033 Hectares, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Least developed countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Australia and Least developed countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Australia ranks 4th and Least developed countries ranks 5th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/australia/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/australia/least-developed-countries/">Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.