China vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

China
528,508 Hectares
in 2020
Resource-rich countries
1.14 million Hectares
in 2020
China rank
2nd
Resource-rich countries rank
3rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • China
  • Resource-rich countries
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M200020102020

How they compare

Resource-rich countries currently reports 1.14 million Hectares against 528,508 Hectares in China, a difference of 606,902 Hectares.

That makes Resource-rich countries's figure about 2.1 times China's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Resource-rich countries has been ahead every year.

China ranks 2nd and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 169 countries.

Resource-rich countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Resource-rich countries Difference Ahead
2000s 526,387 Hectares 1.12 million Hectares 589,118 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2010s 528,682 Hectares 1.13 million Hectares 601,931 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2020s 528,508 Hectares 1.14 million Hectares 606,902 Hectares Resource-rich countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, China or Resource-rich countries?
Resource-rich countries, at 1.14 million Hectares against 528,508 Hectares in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between China and Resource-rich countries?
606,902 Hectares, with Resource-rich countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Resource-rich countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do China and Resource-rich countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
China ranks 2nd and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/china/resource-rich-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/china/resource-rich-countries/">China vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.