Democratic Republic of the Congo vs South Sudan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Democratic Republic of the Congo
33,572 Hectares
in 2020
South Sudan
28,251 Hectares
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
35th
South Sudan rank
36th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • South Sudan
010.0k20.0k30.0k200020102020

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 33,572 Hectares against 28,251 Hectares in South Sudan, a difference of 5,321 Hectares.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 47 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 32,530 Hectares 28,370 Hectares 4,160 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 33,572 Hectares 28,251 Hectares 5,321 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Democratic Republic of the Congo or South Sudan?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 33,572 Hectares against 28,251 Hectares in South Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan?
5,321 Hectares, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 35th and South Sudan ranks 36th of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs South Sudan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/south-sudan/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs South Sudan: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.