East African Community vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

East African Community
147,234 Hectares
in 2020
Namibia
38,810 Hectares
in 2020
East African Community rank
29th
Namibia rank
29th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • East African Community
  • Namibia
50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k150.0k200020102020

How they compare

East African Community currently reports 147,234 Hectares against 38,810 Hectares in Namibia, a difference of 108,424 Hectares.

That makes East African Community's figure about 3.8 times Namibia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, East African Community has been ahead every year.

East African Community ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 29th of 47 groups.

East African Community has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East African Community Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 104,892 Hectares 38,816 Hectares 66,075 Hectares East African Community
2010s 138,654 Hectares 38,809 Hectares 99,845 Hectares East African Community
2020s 147,234 Hectares 38,810 Hectares 108,424 Hectares East African Community

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, East African Community or Namibia?
East African Community, at 147,234 Hectares against 38,810 Hectares in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between East African Community and Namibia?
108,424 Hectares, with East African Community ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East African Community and Namibia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do East African Community and Namibia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
East African Community ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East African Community vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/east-african-community/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/east-african-community/namibia/">East African Community vs Namibia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.