Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Eswatini
1,222 Hectares
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
39,521 Hectares
in 2020
Eswatini rank
25th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
28th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k200020102020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 39,521 Hectares against 1,222 Hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 38,299 Hectares.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 32.3 times Eswatini's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 25th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 28th of 28 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 1,224 Hectares 35,309 Hectares 34,086 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 1,222 Hectares 38,322 Hectares 37,100 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1,222 Hectares 39,521 Hectares 38,299 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Eswatini or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 39,521 Hectares against 1,222 Hectares in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
38,299 Hectares, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Eswatini and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Eswatini ranks 25th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 28th of 28 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/eswatini-2/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/eswatini-2/tanzania/">Eswatini vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.