Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Russian Federation
215,494 Hectares
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
173,596 Hectares
in 2020
Russian Federation rank
6th
Saudi Arabia rank
9th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Saudi Arabia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 215,494 Hectares against 173,596 Hectares in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 41,898 Hectares.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Saudi Arabia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 6th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 169 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 216,055 Hectares 173,695 Hectares 42,360 Hectares Russian Federation
2010s 215,494 Hectares 173,506 Hectares 41,988 Hectares Russian Federation
2020s 215,494 Hectares 173,596 Hectares 41,898 Hectares Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Russian Federation or Saudi Arabia?
Russian Federation, at 215,494 Hectares against 173,596 Hectares in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
41,898 Hectares, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Russian Federation ranks 6th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/russian-federation/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/russian-federation/saudi-arabia/">Russian Federation vs Saudi Arabia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.