Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Sao Tome and Principe
44 Hectares
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
54 Hectares
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe rank
146th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
144th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0204060200020102020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 54 Hectares against 44 Hectares in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 10 Hectares.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 146th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 144th of 169 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 49.1 Hectares 57.2 Hectares 8.1 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 44.2 Hectares 54 Hectares 9.8 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 44 Hectares 54 Hectares 10 Hectares Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Sao Tome and Principe or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 54 Hectares against 44 Hectares in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago?
10 Hectares, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 146th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 144th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/sao-tome-and-principe/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-agricultural-land/sao-tome-and-principe/trinidad-and-tobago/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Trinidad and Tobago: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Agricultural land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.