Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Australia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
25,341 Hectares
in 2020
Australia
30,996 Hectares
in 2020
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
15th
Australia rank
13th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Australia
010.0k20.0k30.0k200020102020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 30,996 Hectares against 25,341 Hectares in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), a difference of 5,655 Hectares.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ahead.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 15th and Australia ranks 13th of 28 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) averaged higher in 1 and Australia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Australia Difference Ahead
2000s 24,992 Hectares 24,873 Hectares 119.33 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2010s 25,284 Hectares 30,903 Hectares 5,619 Hectares Australia
2020s 25,341 Hectares 30,996 Hectares 5,655 Hectares Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Australia?
Australia, at 30,996 Hectares against 25,341 Hectares in Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Australia?
5,655 Hectares, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Australia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Australia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 15th and Australia ranks 13th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Australia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/arab-maghreb-union-uma/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/arab-maghreb-union-uma/australia/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Australia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.