Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
25,341 Hectares
in 2020
Thailand
22,210 Hectares
in 2020
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) rank
15th
Thailand rank
16th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
  • Thailand
010.0k20.0k30.0k200020102020

How they compare

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) currently reports 25,341 Hectares against 22,210 Hectares in Thailand, a difference of 3,131 Hectares.

That makes Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)'s figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) has been ahead every year.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 15th and Thailand ranks 16th of 28 groups.

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 24,992 Hectares 19,050 Hectares 5,942 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2010s 25,284 Hectares 21,435 Hectares 3,849 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)
2020s 25,341 Hectares 22,210 Hectares 3,131 Hectares Arab Maghreb Union (UMA)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) or Thailand?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA), at 25,341 Hectares against 22,210 Hectares in Thailand as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Thailand?
3,131 Hectares, with Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Thailand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) and Thailand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) ranks 15th and Thailand ranks 16th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/arab-maghreb-union-uma/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/arab-maghreb-union-uma/thailand/">Arab Maghreb Union (UMA) vs Thailand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.