Belarus vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belarus
5,760 Hectares
in 2020
Mozambique
5,950 Hectares
in 2020
Belarus rank
43rd
Mozambique rank
42nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belarus
  • Mozambique
02.0k4.0k6.0k200020102020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 5,950 Hectares against 5,760 Hectares in Belarus, a difference of 190 Hectares.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 43rd and Mozambique ranks 42nd of 169 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 5,750 Hectares 4,997 Hectares 752.7 Hectares Belarus
2010s 5,748 Hectares 5,950 Hectares 202.18 Hectares Mozambique
2020s 5,760 Hectares 5,950 Hectares 190 Hectares Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belarus or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 5,950 Hectares against 5,760 Hectares in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belarus and Mozambique?
190 Hectares, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mozambique?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Mozambique rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belarus ranks 43rd and Mozambique ranks 42nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/belarus/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/belarus/mozambique/">Belarus vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.