China (People’s Republic of) vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

China (People’s Republic of)
135,674 Hectares
in 2020
Lithuania
2,285 Hectares
in 2020
China (People’s Republic of) rank
7th
Lithuania rank
5th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Lithuania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200020102020

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 135,674 Hectares against 2,285 Hectares in Lithuania, a difference of 133,389 Hectares.

That makes China (People’s Republic of)'s figure about 59.4 times Lithuania's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, China (People’s Republic of) has been ahead every year.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 5th of 174 countries.

China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People’s Republic of) Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 133,553 Hectares 1,919 Hectares 131,634 Hectares China (People’s Republic of)
2010s 135,848 Hectares 2,230 Hectares 133,618 Hectares China (People’s Republic of)
2020s 135,674 Hectares 2,285 Hectares 133,389 Hectares China (People’s Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, China (People’s Republic of) or Lithuania?
China (People’s Republic of), at 135,674 Hectares against 2,285 Hectares in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between China (People’s Republic of) and Lithuania?
133,389 Hectares, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Lithuania?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Lithuania rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 7th and Lithuania ranks 5th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/china/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/china/lithuania-2/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.