Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Democratic Republic of the Congo
15,372 Hectares
in 2020
Uganda
9,100 Hectares
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
34th
Uganda rank
31st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Uganda
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 15,372 Hectares against 9,100 Hectares in Uganda, a difference of 6,272 Hectares.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 1.7 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 47 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 7,584 Hectares 8,110 Hectares 526.3 Hectares Uganda
2010s 13,630 Hectares 9,080 Hectares 4,550 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 15,372 Hectares 9,100 Hectares 6,272 Hectares Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Uganda?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 15,372 Hectares against 9,100 Hectares in Uganda as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda?
6,272 Hectares, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 34th and Uganda ranks 31st of 47 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/uganda/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Uganda: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.