European Union (27 countries) vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

European Union (27 countries)
110,777 Hectares
in 2020
Myanmar
12,528 Hectares
in 2020
European Union (27 countries) rank
21st
Myanmar rank
23rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • European Union (27 countries)
  • Myanmar
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200020102020

How they compare

European Union (27 countries) currently reports 110,777 Hectares against 12,528 Hectares in Myanmar, a difference of 98,249 Hectares.

That makes European Union (27 countries)'s figure about 8.8 times Myanmar's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, European Union (27 countries) has been ahead every year.

European Union (27 countries) ranks 21st and Myanmar ranks 23rd of 47 regions.

European Union (27 countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade European Union (27 countries) Myanmar Difference Ahead
2000s 116,711 Hectares 11,120 Hectares 105,590 Hectares European Union (27 countries)
2010s 111,985 Hectares 12,388 Hectares 99,597 Hectares European Union (27 countries)
2020s 110,777 Hectares 12,528 Hectares 98,249 Hectares European Union (27 countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, European Union (27 countries) or Myanmar?
European Union (27 countries), at 110,777 Hectares against 12,528 Hectares in Myanmar as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between European Union (27 countries) and Myanmar?
98,249 Hectares, with European Union (27 countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (27 countries) and Myanmar?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do European Union (27 countries) and Myanmar rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
European Union (27 countries) ranks 21st and Myanmar ranks 23rd of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

European Union (27 countries) vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/european-union-27-countries/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/european-union-27-countries/myanmar/">European Union (27 countries) vs Myanmar: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.