Least Developed Countries vs United States: Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Cropland

Least Developed Countries
205,908 Hectares
in 2020
United States
160,437 Hectares
in 2020
Least Developed Countries rank
5th
United States rank
3rd

Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Cropland over time

  • Least Developed Countries
  • United States
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

Least Developed Countries currently reports 205,908 Hectares against 160,437 Hectares in United States, a difference of 45,471 Hectares.

That makes Least Developed Countries's figure about 1.3 times United States's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was United States ahead.

Least Developed Countries ranks 5th and United States ranks 3rd of 28 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Least Developed Countries averaged higher in 2 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries United States Difference Ahead
2000s 165,747 Hectares 170,162 Hectares 4,415 Hectares United States
2010s 197,727 Hectares 159,478 Hectares 38,249 Hectares Least Developed Countries
2020s 205,908 Hectares 160,437 Hectares 45,471 Hectares Least Developed Countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Least Developed Countries or United States?
Least Developed Countries, at 205,908 Hectares against 160,437 Hectares in United States as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Least Developed Countries and United States?
45,471 Hectares, with Least Developed Countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries and United States?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Least Developed Countries and United States rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Least Developed Countries ranks 5th and United States ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries vs United States: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/least-developed-countries/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/least-developed-countries/united-states/">Least Developed Countries vs United States: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.