Madagascar vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Madagascar
3,600 Hectares
in 2020
Resource-rich countries
223,708 Hectares
in 2020
Madagascar rank
4th
Resource-rich countries rank
3rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Madagascar
  • Resource-rich countries
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

Resource-rich countries currently reports 223,708 Hectares against 3,600 Hectares in Madagascar, a difference of 220,108 Hectares.

That makes Resource-rich countries's figure about 62.1 times Madagascar's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Resource-rich countries has been ahead every year.

Madagascar ranks 4th and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 18 groups.

Resource-rich countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Resource-rich countries Difference Ahead
2000s 3,570 Hectares 217,775 Hectares 214,205 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2010s 3,600 Hectares 221,467 Hectares 217,867 Hectares Resource-rich countries
2020s 3,600 Hectares 223,708 Hectares 220,108 Hectares Resource-rich countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Madagascar or Resource-rich countries?
Resource-rich countries, at 223,708 Hectares against 3,600 Hectares in Madagascar as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Madagascar and Resource-rich countries?
220,108 Hectares, with Resource-rich countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Resource-rich countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Madagascar and Resource-rich countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Madagascar ranks 4th and Resource-rich countries ranks 3rd of 18 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/madagascar-2/resource-rich-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/madagascar-2/resource-rich-countries/">Madagascar vs Resource-rich countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.