Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Malawi
3,800 Hectares
in 2020
Zimbabwe
4,100 Hectares
in 2020
Malawi rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
61st

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020102020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4,100 Hectares against 3,800 Hectares in Malawi, a difference of 300 Hectares.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 174 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 3,222 Hectares 3,965 Hectares 743 Hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 3,786 Hectares 4,120 Hectares 334.5 Hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 3,800 Hectares 4,100 Hectares 300 Hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4,100 Hectares against 3,800 Hectares in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
300 Hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Malawi ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 61st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability β€” Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.