Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Myanmar
12,528 Hectares
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
15,521 Hectares
in 2020
Myanmar rank
23rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
22nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Myanmar
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 15,521 Hectares against 12,528 Hectares in Myanmar, a difference of 2,993 Hectares.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 22nd of 169 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 11,120 Hectares 11,309 Hectares 188.71 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 12,388 Hectares 14,354 Hectares 1,966 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 12,528 Hectares 15,521 Hectares 2,993 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Myanmar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 15,521 Hectares against 12,528 Hectares in Myanmar as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
2,993 Hectares, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Myanmar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Myanmar ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 22nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/myanmar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-cropland/myanmar/tanzania/">Myanmar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Cropland
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
244 places, 5,106 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.