Africa, resource-rich countries vs Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Africa, resource-rich countries
128,527 Hectares
in 2020
Congo
21,946 Hectares
in 2020
Africa, resource-rich countries rank
25th
Congo rank
27th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Africa, resource-rich countries
  • Congo
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200020102020

How they compare

Africa, resource-rich countries currently reports 128,527 Hectares against 21,946 Hectares in Congo, a difference of 106,581 Hectares.

That makes Africa, resource-rich countries's figure about 5.9 times Congo's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Africa, resource-rich countries has been ahead every year.

Africa, resource-rich countries ranks 25th and Congo ranks 27th of 47 regions.

Africa, resource-rich countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, resource-rich countries Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 131,976 Hectares 22,141 Hectares 109,835 Hectares Africa, resource-rich countries
2010s 131,003 Hectares 22,020 Hectares 108,983 Hectares Africa, resource-rich countries
2020s 128,527 Hectares 21,946 Hectares 106,581 Hectares Africa, resource-rich countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, resource-rich countries or Congo?
Africa, resource-rich countries, at 128,527 Hectares against 21,946 Hectares in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, resource-rich countries and Congo?
106,581 Hectares, with Africa, resource-rich countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, resource-rich countries and Congo?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, resource-rich countries and Congo rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, resource-rich countries ranks 25th and Congo ranks 27th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, resource-rich countries vs Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/africa-resource-rich-countries/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/africa-resource-rich-countries/congo-rep/">Africa, resource-rich countries vs Congo: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.