Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Australia
134,005 Hectares
in 2020
Least developed countries
532,478 Hectares
in 2020
Australia rank
7th
Least developed countries rank
6th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Australia
  • Least developed countries
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k200020102020

How they compare

Least developed countries currently reports 532,478 Hectares against 134,005 Hectares in Australia, a difference of 398,473 Hectares.

That makes Least developed countries's figure about 4.0 times Australia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Least developed countries has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 6th of 170 countries.

Least developed countries has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Least developed countries Difference Ahead
2000s 130,793 Hectares 588,433 Hectares 457,640 Hectares Least developed countries
2010s 132,398 Hectares 553,825 Hectares 421,426 Hectares Least developed countries
2020s 134,005 Hectares 532,478 Hectares 398,473 Hectares Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Australia or Least developed countries?
Least developed countries, at 532,478 Hectares against 134,005 Hectares in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Australia and Least developed countries?
398,473 Hectares, with Least developed countries ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Least developed countries?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Australia and Least developed countries rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Australia ranks 7th and Least developed countries ranks 6th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/australia/least-developed-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/australia/least-developed-countries/">Australia vs Least developed countries: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.