Belarus vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Belarus
8,768 Hectares
in 2020
New Zealand
9,893 Hectares
in 2020
Belarus rank
52nd
New Zealand rank
49th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200020102020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 9,893 Hectares against 8,768 Hectares in Belarus, a difference of 1,125 Hectares.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 52nd and New Zealand ranks 49th of 170 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 8,434 Hectares 9,849 Hectares 1,416 Hectares New Zealand
2010s 8,672 Hectares 9,850 Hectares 1,179 Hectares New Zealand
2020s 8,768 Hectares 9,893 Hectares 1,125 Hectares New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Belarus or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 9,893 Hectares against 8,768 Hectares in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Belarus and New Zealand?
1,125 Hectares, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Belarus ranks 52nd and New Zealand ranks 49th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.