Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Forest … Forest land

Central African Republic
22,303 Hectares
in 2020
Eswatini
497.56 Hectares
in 2020
Central African Republic rank
26th
Eswatini rank
24th

Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Forest … Forest land over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200020102020

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 22,303 Hectares against 497.56 Hectares in Eswatini, a difference of 21,805 Hectares.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 44.8 times Eswatini's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 26th and Eswatini ranks 24th of 170 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 22,768 Hectares 478.75 Hectares 22,289 Hectares Central African Republic
2010s 22,468 Hectares 490.89 Hectares 21,977 Hectares Central African Republic
2020s 22,303 Hectares 497.56 Hectares 21,805 Hectares Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Central African Republic or Eswatini?
Central African Republic, at 22,303 Hectares against 497.56 Hectares in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Central African Republic and Eswatini?
21,805 Hectares, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eswatini?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Central African Republic and Eswatini rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Central African Republic ranks 26th and Eswatini ranks 24th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/central-african-republic/eswatini-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/central-african-republic/eswatini-2/">Central African Republic vs Eswatini: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.