China, People's Republic of vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

China, People's Republic of
219,978 Hectares
in 2020
Lithuania
2,201 Hectares
in 2020
China, People's Republic of rank
9th
Lithuania rank
9th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • China, People's Republic of
  • Lithuania
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020102020

How they compare

China, People's Republic of currently reports 219,978 Hectares against 2,201 Hectares in Lithuania, a difference of 217,777 Hectares.

That makes China, People's Republic of's figure about 99.9 times Lithuania's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, China, People's Republic of has been ahead every year.

China, People's Republic of ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 175 countries.

China, People's Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, People's Republic of Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 187,625 Hectares 2,088 Hectares 185,537 Hectares China, People's Republic of
2010s 209,383 Hectares 2,186 Hectares 207,198 Hectares China, People's Republic of
2020s 219,978 Hectares 2,201 Hectares 217,777 Hectares China, People's Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, China, People's Republic of or Lithuania?
China, People's Republic of, at 219,978 Hectares against 2,201 Hectares in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between China, People's Republic of and Lithuania?
217,777 Hectares, with China, People's Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, People's Republic of and Lithuania?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do China, People's Republic of and Lithuania rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
China, People's Republic of ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, People's Republic of vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/china/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/china/lithuania-2/">China, People's Republic of vs Lithuania: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. <br><br> Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.