Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Lao People's Democratic Republic
16,596 Hectares
in 2020
Suriname
15,196 Hectares
in 2020
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
39th
Suriname rank
42nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Suriname
05.0k10.0k15.0k200020102020

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 16,596 Hectares against 15,196 Hectares in Suriname, a difference of 1,400 Hectares.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 39th and Suriname ranks 42nd of 170 countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 17,207 Hectares 15,322 Hectares 1,885 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 16,785 Hectares 15,256 Hectares 1,530 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 16,596 Hectares 15,196 Hectares 1,399 Hectares Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Suriname?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 16,596 Hectares against 15,196 Hectares in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?
1,400 Hectares, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 39th and Suriname ranks 42nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/lao-pdr/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/lao-pdr/suriname/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.