Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Lao People's Democratic Republic
16,596 Hectares
in 2020
Zimbabwe
17,445 Hectares
in 2020
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
36th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k200020102020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17,445 Hectares against 16,596 Hectares in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 849 Hectares.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 170 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 17,207 Hectares 18,159 Hectares 951.68 Hectares Zimbabwe
2010s 16,785 Hectares 17,698 Hectares 912.72 Hectares Zimbabwe
2020s 16,596 Hectares 17,445 Hectares 849.1 Hectares Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17,445 Hectares against 16,596 Hectares in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
849 Hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 36th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.