Low income countries (World Bank) vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Low income countries (World Bank)
299,186 Hectares
in 2020
Zambia
44,814 Hectares
in 2020
Low income countries (World Bank) rank
16th
Zambia rank
17th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Low income countries (World Bank)
  • Zambia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k200020102020

How they compare

Low income countries (World Bank) currently reports 299,186 Hectares against 44,814 Hectares in Zambia, a difference of 254,372 Hectares.

That makes Low income countries (World Bank)'s figure about 6.7 times Zambia's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Low income countries (World Bank) has been ahead every year.

Low income countries (World Bank) ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 47 regions.

Low income countries (World Bank) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income countries (World Bank) Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 328,405 Hectares 46,893 Hectares 281,512 Hectares Low income countries (World Bank)
2010s 310,416 Hectares 45,849 Hectares 264,567 Hectares Low income countries (World Bank)
2020s 299,186 Hectares 44,814 Hectares 254,372 Hectares Low income countries (World Bank)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Low income countries (World Bank) or Zambia?
Low income countries (World Bank), at 299,186 Hectares against 44,814 Hectares in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Low income countries (World Bank) and Zambia?
254,372 Hectares, with Low income countries (World Bank) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income countries (World Bank) and Zambia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Low income countries (World Bank) and Zambia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Low income countries (World Bank) ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income countries (World Bank) vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/low-income-countries-world-bank/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/low-income-countries-world-bank/zambia/">Low income countries (World Bank) vs Zambia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.