Mauritania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Mauritania
312.8 Hectares
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
45,745 Hectares
in 2020
Mauritania rank
26th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
16th

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Mauritania
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0k40.0k60.0k200020102020

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 45,745 Hectares against 312.8 Hectares in Mauritania, a difference of 45,432 Hectares.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 146.2 times Mauritania's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 26th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 28 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 397.16 Hectares 51,996 Hectares 51,599 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 342.76 Hectares 48,179 Hectares 47,836 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 312.8 Hectares 45,745 Hectares 45,432 Hectares Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Mauritania or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 45,745 Hectares against 312.8 Hectares in Mauritania as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
45,432 Hectares, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Mauritania and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Mauritania ranks 26th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 16th of 28 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/mauritania-2/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-forest-land/mauritania-2/tanzania/">Mauritania vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Forest land
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.