Africa, small island developing states vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

Africa, small island developing states
3,746 Hectares
in 2020
Botswana
56,673 Hectares
in 2020
Africa, small island developing states rank
43rd
Botswana rank
43rd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • Africa, small island developing states
  • Botswana
020.0k40.0k60.0k200020102020

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 56,673 Hectares against 3,746 Hectares in Africa, small island developing states, a difference of 52,927 Hectares.

That makes Botswana's figure about 15.1 times Africa, small island developing states's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Africa, small island developing states ranks 43rd and Botswana ranks 43rd of 47 regions.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, small island developing states Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 3,746 Hectares 56,673 Hectares 52,927 Hectares Botswana
2010s 3,746 Hectares 56,673 Hectares 52,927 Hectares Botswana
2020s 3,746 Hectares 56,673 Hectares 52,927 Hectares Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, small island developing states or Botswana?
Botswana, at 56,673 Hectares against 3,746 Hectares in Africa, small island developing states as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, small island developing states and Botswana?
52,927 Hectares, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, small island developing states and Botswana?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, small island developing states and Botswana rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, small island developing states ranks 43rd and Botswana ranks 43rd of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, small island developing states vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/africa-small-island-developing-states/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/africa-small-island-developing-states/botswana/">Africa, small island developing states vs Botswana: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.