Africa, small island developing states vs Estonia: Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Land area

Africa, small island developing states
3,746 Hectares
in 2020
Estonia
4,275 Hectares
in 2020
Africa, small island developing states rank
43rd
Estonia rank
42nd

Africa's Development: Ecological sustainability Land area over time

  • Africa, small island developing states
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200020102020

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 4,275 Hectares against 3,746 Hectares in Africa, small island developing states, a difference of 529 Hectares.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Africa, small island developing states's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Africa, small island developing states ranks 43rd and Estonia ranks 42nd of 47 regions.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa, small island developing states Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 3,746 Hectares 4,239 Hectares 492.9 Hectares Estonia
2010s 3,746 Hectares 4,293 Hectares 546.9 Hectares Estonia
2020s 3,746 Hectares 4,275 Hectares 528.9 Hectares Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, Africa, small island developing states or Estonia?
Estonia, at 4,275 Hectares against 3,746 Hectares in Africa, small island developing states as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between Africa, small island developing states and Estonia?
529 Hectares, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa, small island developing states and Estonia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Africa, small island developing states and Estonia rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
Africa, small island developing states ranks 43rd and Estonia ranks 42nd of 47 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa, small island developing states vs Estonia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/africa-small-island-developing-states/estonia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/africa-small-island-developing-states/estonia-2/">Africa, small island developing states vs Estonia: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.