East African Community vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological

East African Community
460,479 Hectares
in 2020
Mozambique
78,638 Hectares
in 2020
East African Community rank
29th
Mozambique rank
32nd

Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological over time

  • East African Community
  • Mozambique
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k200020102020

How they compare

East African Community currently reports 460,479 Hectares against 78,638 Hectares in Mozambique, a difference of 381,841 Hectares.

That makes East African Community's figure about 5.9 times Mozambique's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, East African Community has been ahead every year.

East African Community ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 32nd of 47 groups.

East African Community has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East African Community Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 397,215 Hectares 78,638 Hectares 318,577 Hectares East African Community
2010s 447,840 Hectares 78,638 Hectares 369,202 Hectares East African Community
2020s 460,479 Hectares 78,638 Hectares 381,841 Hectares East African Community

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological, East African Community or Mozambique?
East African Community, at 460,479 Hectares against 78,638 Hectares in Mozambique as of 2020.
What is the difference in africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological between East African Community and Mozambique?
381,841 Hectares, with East African Community ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East African Community and Mozambique?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do East African Community and Mozambique rank globally for africa's development dynamics (afdd) table 23 - ecological?
East African Community ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East African Community vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/east-african-community/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/africa-s-development-dynamics-afdd-table-23-ecological-sustainability-land-area/east-african-community/mozambique/">East African Community vs Mozambique: Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 23 - Ecological sustainability — Land area
Unit
Hectares
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
245 places, 5,127 data points, 2000–2020
Last refreshed

The Statistical Annex to the annual Africa's Development Dynamics (AFDD) report is a collection of development indicators that were gathered and analysed while conducting the research that went into the report. These data are also available online for free viewing or download at https://oe.cd/AFDD-2024, a bilingual website which links to the electronic version of the Africa's Development Dynamics book in both English and French. Table 23 shows indicators of ecological sustainability, in terms of land use. This includes number of hectars of land allocated to different kinds of use, carbon stock in living biomass, and fertiliser use, and wood production.