What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Puerto Rico?

0 1000 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Puerto Rico?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Agricultural land — Area, per capita

Equatorial Guinea

0.0001 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Puerto Rico

0.0001 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

167th

Puerto Rico rank

166th

Agricultural land — Area, per capita over time

Equatorial Guinea
Puerto Rico

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0001 1000 ha per person against 0.0001 1000 ha per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 166th of 186 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Puerto Rico	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0005 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0.0004 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0003 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1980s	0.0003 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land — area, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Puerto Rico?: Puerto Rico, at 0.0001 1000 ha per person against 0.0001 1000 ha per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Puerto Rico?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Puerto Rico?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Puerto Rico rank globally for agricultural land — area, per capita?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 167th and Puerto Rico ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Agricultural land — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/puerto-rico-us/">Equatorial Guinea vs Puerto Rico: Agricultural land — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 11,050 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 14 September 2026

Agricultural land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.