Iceland vs South Sudan: Agricultural land — Area, per capita
Iceland
0.0042 1000 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0024 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Iceland rank
11th
South Sudan rank
14th
Agricultural land — Area, per capita over time
- Iceland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0042 1000 ha per person against 0.0024 1000 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0018 1000 ha per person.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.8 times South Sudan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 11th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0056 1000 ha per person | 0.0026 1000 ha per person | 0.0029 1000 ha per person | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0047 1000 ha per person | 0.0025 1000 ha per person | 0.0022 1000 ha per person | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural land — area, per capita, Iceland or South Sudan?
- Iceland, at 0.0042 1000 ha per person against 0.0024 1000 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per capita between Iceland and South Sudan?
- 0.0018 1000 ha per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and South Sudan rank globally for agricultural land — area, per capita?
- Iceland ranks 11th and South Sudan ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.