Iraq vs Luxembourg: Agricultural land — Area, per capita
Iraq
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.0002 1000 ha per person
in 2024
Iraq rank
125th
Luxembourg rank
127th
Agricultural land — Area, per capita over time
- Iraq
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 186 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | 0.0003 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0.0002 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural land — area, per capita, Iraq or Luxembourg?
- Iraq, at 0.0002 1000 ha per person against 0.0002 1000 ha per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per capita between Iraq and Luxembourg?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Luxembourg rank globally for agricultural land — area, per capita?
- Iraq ranks 125th and Luxembourg ranks 127th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Agricultural land — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.