Which has higher agricultural land — area, per unit of gdp, Qatar or Turks and Caicos Islands?

Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.

What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per unit of gdp between Qatar and Turks and Caicos Islands?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Turks and Caicos Islands?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP

Qatar

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Turks and Caicos Islands

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Qatar rank

180th

Turks and Caicos Islands rank

177th

Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Qatar
Turks and Caicos Islands

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Qatar, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.7 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 177th of 184 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Turks and Caicos Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land — area, per unit of gdp, Qatar or Turks and Caicos Islands?: Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural land — area, per unit of gdp between Qatar and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Turks and Caicos Islands?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Qatar and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for agricultural land — area, per unit of gdp?: Qatar ranks 180th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 177th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/qatar/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-area-per-unit-of-gdp/qatar/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Qatar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agricultural land — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 9,922 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 14 September 2026

Agricultural land — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.