Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Agricultural land — Area
Agricultural land — Area over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 863,406 1000 ha against 373,213 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 490,193 1000 ha.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 255 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 502,086 1000 ha | 698,415 1000 ha | 196,330 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 511,032 1000 ha | 706,761 1000 ha | 195,729 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 496,265 1000 ha | 719,439 1000 ha | 223,174 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 476,297 1000 ha | 769,079 1000 ha | 292,782 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 430,175 1000 ha | 808,127 1000 ha | 377,952 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 379,873 1000 ha | 844,224 1000 ha | 464,351 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 371,867 1000 ha | 861,374 1000 ha | 489,507 1000 ha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agricultural land — area, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 863,406 1000 ha against 373,213 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agricultural land — area between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 490,193 1000 ha, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for agricultural land — area?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 255 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural land — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.