Cabo Verde vs Eswatini: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area

Cabo Verde
426.6 USD_PPP/ha
in 2024
Eswatini
416.77 USD_PPP/ha
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
182nd
Eswatini rank
185th

Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Eswatini
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Cabo Verde currently reports 426.6 USD_PPP/ha against 416.77 USD_PPP/ha in Eswatini, a difference of 9.83 USD_PPP/ha.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Cabo Verde has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Eswatini ranks 185th of 229 countries.

Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 341.76 USD_PPP/ha 108.24 USD_PPP/ha 233.52 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
1970s 242.64 USD_PPP/ha 178.88 USD_PPP/ha 63.76 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
1980s 443.89 USD_PPP/ha 278.64 USD_PPP/ha 165.25 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
1990s 538.6 USD_PPP/ha 299.29 USD_PPP/ha 239.3 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
2000s 573.37 USD_PPP/ha 315.18 USD_PPP/ha 258.19 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
2010s 555.08 USD_PPP/ha 372.94 USD_PPP/ha 182.14 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde
2020s 438.33 USD_PPP/ha 392.98 USD_PPP/ha 45.35 USD_PPP/ha Cabo Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area, Cabo Verde or Eswatini?
Cabo Verde, at 426.6 USD_PPP/ha against 416.77 USD_PPP/ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area between Cabo Verde and Eswatini?
9.83 USD_PPP/ha, with Cabo Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Eswatini?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cabo Verde and Eswatini rank globally for agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area?
Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Eswatini ranks 185th of 229 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Eswatini: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-value-of-agricultural-production-int-per-area/cabo-verde-2/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-value-of-agricultural-production-int-per-area/cabo-verde-2/eswatini/">Cabo Verde vs Eswatini: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area
Unit
USD_PPP/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
258 places, 14,894 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.